This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Gibson, D.M. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Rosy Goals, Reactive Practice: Interpreting Programme Failure

Humanities Griffith University

Much evaluation research has focussed on the impact of innovative health programmes, yet there have been few attempts to identify the reasons underlying reported programme successes or failures. This shortcoming has reduced the generalisability of research findings, and hence their policy relevance. This paper explores the reported failure of two Queensland community health centres to improve the health status of the communities served. The data indicate a lack of fit between pro gramme goals and practice. Strong support for the specified goals at all levels of implementation, however, negates the hypothesis that the evaluation was based on "unreal" goals. Four alternative explanations are developed — "grandiose goals", "bureaucratic red tape", "staff fallibility" and the "exigencies of the job". The paper concludes with an assessment of the relevance of this analysis to other innovative health programmes.

Journal of Sociology, Vol. 20, No. 2, 218-232 (1984)
DOI: 10.1177/144078338402000204


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?