Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

SAGETRACK

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Sociology
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by James, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Occupational Injury: Accidental or a Reflection of Conflict Between Capital and Labour?

Claire James

Griffith University

The term 'accident' suggests an unexpected or unforeseen happening which afflicts a worker. Historically there has been a tendency to categorise such injuries as aberrant or unusual with a focus upon the individual injured. High injury rates tend to occur in lower socio- economic groups whose perception of causation and work experience place them at odds with management. At the same time injuries are treated, investigated and compensated at an individual leveL This medical and legal individualisation process has served to obscure group susceptibility and group responses to health threat. Further, patterns of behaviour, injuries and overt conflict may be related to the levels of control experienced at work A case study of a large Brisbane factory demonstrated that a conflict of interest was recognised by both workers and management and resulted in tacit acceptance of 'restrictive labour practices', as survival mechanisms. This recognition of inherent danger, injury-avoidance withdrawal and the contradictory nature of control for safety and production, by both sides, is de facto legitimation of occupational injuries being embedded in the social relations of production - rather than being 'accidental'.

Journal of Sociology, Vol. 23, No. 1, 47-64 (1987)
DOI: 10.1177/144078338702300104
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?