Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Sociology
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Turner, B. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

The Talking Disease: Hilda Bruch and Anorexia Nervosa

Bryan S. Turner

Department of Sociology University of Essex England

In this note on anorexia nervosa, it is assumed that the sociology of health and illness must adopt a three-level model of explanation. We have to understand the phenomenology of illness within the world of the patient. The problem with 'positivistic' approaches (based upon a medical model) is that they examine the condition independently of its constitution by a knowledgeable agent. Anorexia is not just a question of having anorexia; it is fundamentally about being anorexic. Secondly, there is the sociology of illness behaviour which examines the sick role. Finally, there is a political economy of health which is broadly concerned with the distribution of resources (including health) in a society. It can also be argued that a'condition' as complex as anorexia requires a multidisciplinary perspective to understand the various levels in which this disorder can be conceptualised in terms of its various social and cultural mean ings. Existing approaches to anorexia are typically under developed because they adopt uncritically an unidimensional view of the etiology of anorexia behaviour. Hilda Bruch's clinical work is important in this context as a multi-discipli nary interpretative approach. As a supplementary theoretical strategy, this note extends the therapeutic insights of Bruch by considering anorexia in terms of a phenomenology of the mouth as a 'talking disease' about familial interaction in societies which place an emphasis on individual competition. Being sick involves a special type of linguistic membership through socialisation in a sick role. The understanding of the meaning of sickness in medical practice can be seen consequently as a version of the methodology of verstehende soziologie.

Journal of Sociology, Vol. 26, No. 2, 157-169 (1990)
DOI: 10.1177/144078339002600201


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?