Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Sociology
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Papadakis, E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Conjectures about Public Opinion and the Australian Welfare State

Elim Papadakis

Department of Sociology University of New England

The recent development of the Australian welfare state is often characterised by writers on social policy as heavily influenced by a tax revolt, by welfare backlash, by a fiscal and legitimation crisis and by the privatisation of services. This paper argues that although writers on public opinion and the welfare state have pointed to significant changes both in politics and the economy, they have often misinterpreted the nature of support for the welfare state in Australia. Above all, in response to the challenge by the New Right, they have overstated the shift away from a commitment both by policy makers and by most of the public to collective provision for income maintenance, health and education. I would argue that the New Right, in so far as it can be identified as a major proponent of radical reform of the welfare state, has exercised a decisive influence on intellectual debates rather than on public attitudes and public policy. These intellectual debates tend to underestimate the significance of institutional and historical factors that continue to shape the development of the Australian welfare state.

Journal of Sociology, Vol. 26, No. 2, 209-234 (1990)
DOI: 10.1177/144078339002600204


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?