Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Sociology
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Burchell, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

The Curious Career of Economic Rationalism: Government and Economy in the Current Policy Debate

David Burchell

Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, University of Western Sydney, Nepean

The passionate polemics of the recent debate on 'economic rationalism' have concealed the fact that many of the key arguments on both sides of the debate are animated by a similar view of economic rationalism as an ideology struggling to come into reality. This paper argues that, on the contrary, economic rationalism is best understood as a distinctive style of government, often with only a limited resemblance in its governmental techniques to the claims of neoliberal discourse. Further, the paper contends that the picture of economic rationalism as a form of anti-government is fantastical. Intense and complex techniques of government are an indispensable part of the governance of modern Western economies and societies. Economic rationalists may claim to have reintroduced 'natural' market mechanisms in place of the activity of government, yet these 'quasi-markets' are themselves for the most part highly governed phenomena.

Journal of Sociology, Vol. 30, No. 3, 322-333 (1994)
DOI: 10.1177/144078339403000306


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?