Journal of Sociology

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for free access to the SAGE eReference platform!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Parker, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Journal of Sociology, Vol. 33, No. 1, 39-55 (1997)
DOI: 10.1177/144078339703300104

Converting the lawyers: the dynamics of competition and accountability reform

Christine Parker

Law Faculty, University of New South Wales, Sydney

The success of competition and accountability reform to the Australian legal profession is found to be as dependent on the process by which it is introduced as on its substantive merits. A diversity of opinions on, and experiences of, reform proposals was gathered through interviews with forty-one lawyers selected by the difference discovery method. Their varied responses to reform were analysed using the constant comparative method and placed into two broad categories: (a) conversion stories based on community responsiveness, persuasive dialogue, discovery of self-interest, pragmatic acceptance of fate and surrender to market forces; and (b) defiance stories induced by discredit and disrespect. It was found that individual lawyers and professional associ ations have responded constructively to persuasion and dialogue especially when they also see reform as inevitable. They have resisted when change is introduced in a way that denies them a role in their own regulation and reform.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?