This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Lupton, D. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Crime control, citizenship and the state: lay understandings of crime, its causes and solutions

Centre for Cultural Risk Research Charles Sturt University, Bathurst

Recent policies in Western countries have emphasised the notion of personal responsibility in crime control, drawing attention away from the role of government agencies in dealing with crime. This article explores how this approach to crime control has been taken up in lay ideas about the causes of and solutions to crime. Drawing on a major empirical study on fear of crime among a group of Australians living in urban and rural areas, it is argued that the discourse of personal responsibility was indeed evident in lay accounts. However, the participants also resisted the notion that the state should relinquish paternal protection of its citizens and direct intervention into crime. Their understandings of crime located it within a wider causal network that incorporated ideas about the role of social institutions, welfare and the state in preventing crime.

Journal of Sociology, Vol. 35, No. 3, 297-311 (1999)
DOI: 10.1177/144078339903500303


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				R. Yarwood The geographies of policing Progress in Human Geography, August 1, 2007; 31(4): 447 - 465. [Abstract] [PDF]