Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

SAGETRACK

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Sociology
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Phelan, T. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Bibliometrics and the evaluation of Australian sociology

Thomas J. Phelan

Australian National University and University of California (Los Angeles)

The Australian government has expressed a continuing interest in the assessment of research productivity as a basic element of a 'rationalised' research funding process. Bibliometric analyses are among the techniques that the government uses to evaluate the quality of research performance. Like many other disciplines, sociology is a target of these assessments. This paper presents data to demonstrate how Australian sociology might measure up if subjected to an inquiry using these methods. Data are provided on the standing of Australian sociology internationally and on the research contributions of major Australian universities. Several important methodological issues are reviewed and discussed. It is concluded that Australian sociologists would be well served by becoming active participants in the ongoing national debate over the assessment of research performance and the allocation of funding for tertiary education and science.

Journal of Sociology, Vol. 36, No. 3, 345-363 (2000)
DOI: 10.1177/144078330003600305


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of SociologyHome page
J. Glaser
Why are the Most Influential Books in Australian Sociology not Necessarily the Most Highly Cited Ones?
Journal of Sociology, September 1, 2004; 40(3): 261 - 282.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of SociologyHome page
J. M. Najman and B. Hewitt
The validity of publication and citation counts for Sociology and other selected disciplines
Journal of Sociology, March 1, 2003; 39(1): 62 - 80.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Consumer CultureHome page
A. Possamai
Cultural Consumption of History and Popular Culture in Alternative Spiritualities
Journal of Consumer Culture, July 1, 2002; 2(2): 197 - 218.
[Abstract] [PDF]