Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Sociology
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lupton, D.
Right arrow Articles by Noble, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Mine/not mine: appropriating personal computers in the academic workplace

Deborah Lupton

School of Social Sciences and Liberal Studies, Charles Sturt University

Greg Noble

School of Cultural Histories and Futures, University of Western Sydney

Contemporary theoretical perspectives seek to represent consumption as a processual phenomenon, in which there is a mutually constitutive relationship between humans and material artefacts. Strategies of appropriation – the incorporation of an initially ‘alien’ object into subjectivity via everyday use – have been identified as important to these processes. This article addresses the ways in which consumers appropriate a specific mass-produced commodity – the personal computer – in the context of the university workplace. Drawing on semi-structured interviews with 40 people about their use of personal computers at work, the article focuses on two major strategies of appropriation of these objects: decoration, including adding other artefacts to the outside of the computer and manipulating the appearance of the screen for purely aesthetic purposes, and configuration, involving such activities as arranging the layout of the computer interface and software, and constructing personal files. It is argued that, over time, and despite the initial highly alienating features of computers and a broader ambivalence concerning the incorporation of technologies like computers into notions of the self, the particular capacities of personal computers and their role in everyday working life tend to render them into highly personalized artefacts that may be significantly invested with selfhood.

Key Words: appropriation • consumption • personal computers • subjectivity

Journal of Sociology, Vol. 38, No. 1, 5-23 (2002)
DOI: 10.1177/144078330203800101


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of Consumer CultureHome page
K. Ilmonen
The Use of and Commitment to Goods
Journal of Consumer Culture, March 1, 2004; 4(1): 27 - 50.
[Abstract] [PDF]