Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Sociology
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Singleton, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Men Getting Real?

A Study of Relationship Change in Two Men's Groups

Andrew Singleton

School of Political and Social Inquiry, Monash University, andrew.singleton{at}arts.monash.edu.au

Questions about men's capacity to change the ways they relate to one another have informed recent scholarly and popular discussions about men's relationships. One social context which consistently produces anecdotal claims about changes in men's relationships is dedicated men's groups. This article presents the findings from a qualitative study conducted with participants in two relationally centred men's groups. It discusses the type and quality of relationship change experienced by the participants in both groups and identifies the socio-cultural factors which appear to have facilitated this change. According to the informants, group involvement enabled them to transcend traditional masculine modes of relating and form intimate and trusting relationships with other participants. The interviews indicate that this change is attributable to various immediate contextual factors related to the group itself, rather than to a strident commitment to challenging traditional masculine codes of behaviour.

Key Words: intimacy • men's groups • men's relationships • social change

Journal of Sociology, Vol. 39, No. 2, 131-147 (2003)
DOI: 10.1177/00048690030392002


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of SociologyHome page
K. J. Butera
`Neo-mateship' in the 21st century: Changes in the performance of Australian masculinity
Journal of Sociology, September 1, 2008; 44(3): 265 - 281.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Family IssuesHome page
S. K. Ammons and P. Edgell
Religious Influences on Work-Family Trade-Offs
Journal of Family Issues, June 1, 2007; 28(6): 794 - 826.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Qualitative InquiryHome page
K. J. Butera
Manhunt: The Challenge of Enticing Men to Participate in a Study on Friendship
Qualitative Inquiry, December 1, 2006; 12(6): 1262 - 1282.
[Abstract] [PDF]