Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Sociology
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (6)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Warr, D. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Social networks in a ‘discredited’ neighbourhood

Deborah J. Warr

Centre for Health and Society, University of Melbourne, djwarr{at}unimelb.edu.au

Neighbourhoods are vulnerable to being stigmatized with implications for residents’ social networks, experiences of social connectedness, and opportunities for developing or accessing social capital. Goffman defined stigma as a discrediting attribute that impairs social acceptability. Poverty can be considered a discrediting attribute and stigma is experienced through negative labelling and stereotyping of the poor. Using qualitative data collected through interviews and participant observation in two impoverished suburbs in Victoria, Australia, this article explores experiences of neighbourhood, social networks and stigma as they are perceived by residents and people working in the neighbourhood. There was evidence of people being involved in supportive local bonding networks but few people were linked in bridging networks that extended outside the neighbourhood. Bridging networks are considered to be most effective for accessing valuable forms of social capital. The article considers social contexts for residents’ networks for their potential to generate social capital. Contemporary contexts for the stigmatization of poverty and possibilities for ‘destigmatizing’ social groups and neighbourhoods are discussed.

Key Words: neighbourhood • social capital • social networks • socioeconomic disadvantage • stigma

Journal of Sociology, Vol. 41, No. 3, 285-308 (2005)
DOI: 10.1177/1440783305057081


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of SociologyHome page
M. Alston and J. Kent
Generation X-pendable: The social exclusion of rural and remote young people
Journal of Sociology, March 1, 2009; 45(1): 89 - 107.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
SociologyHome page
T. Edensor and S. Millington
Illuminations, Class Identities and the Contested Landscapes of Christmas
Sociology, February 1, 2009; 43(1): 103 - 121.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Qual Health ResHome page
K. Cook and K. Nunkoosing
Maintaining Dignity and Managing Stigma in the Interview Encounter: The Challenge of Paid-For Participation
Qual Health Res, March 1, 2008; 18(3): 418 - 427.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Urban StudHome page
V. K. Gosling
Regenerating Communities: Women's Experiences of Urban Regeneration
Urban Stud, March 1, 2008; 45(3): 607 - 626.
[Abstract] [PDF]