Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Sociology
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Willis, S.
Right arrow Articles by Tranter, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Beyond the ‘digital divide’

Internet diffusion and inequality in Australia

Suzanne Willis

Bruce Tranter

School of Sociology and Social Work, University of Tasmania

The increasing potential of the Internet to widen access to information and enhance communication capacity has brought opposing arguments about the social consequences of Internet use. Advocates of the ‘digital divide’ thesis argue that the Internet advantages privileged groups while further marginalizing disadvantaged social categories. Critics of the thesis see the expansion of the Internet as enabling and egalitarian, promoting social inclusion and facilitating democratic participation. In order to assess which view is more plausible, we examine the social barriers to Internet use in Australia over a five-year period, using multivariate analyses of national survey data. The notion of a ‘digital divide’ is too simplistic to capture the complexity of social barriers to Internet use. Although the Internet has become more accessible to all social categories, and further technological diffusion should widen this accessibility, household income, age, education and occupational class location remain as key dimensions of differential Internet use.

Key Words: digital divide • Internet • social class • social inequality

Journal of Sociology, Vol. 42, No. 1, 43-59 (2006)
DOI: 10.1177/1440783306061352


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
New Media SocietyHome page
K. McCallum and F. Papandrea
Community business: the internet in remote Australian Indigenous communities
New Media Society, November 1, 2009; 11(7): 1230 - 1251.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Br J Soc WorkHome page
S. Tregeagle and M. Darcy
Child Welfare and Information and Communication Technology: Today's Challenge
Br. J. Soc. Work, December 1, 2008; 38(8): 1481 - 1498.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
New Media SocietyHome page
M. Hooghe and W. Teepe
Party profiles on the web: an analysis of the logfiles of non-partisan interactive political internet sites in the 2003 and 2004 election campaigns in Belgium
New Media Society, December 1, 2007; 9(6): 965 - 985.
[Abstract] [PDF]