This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Voyce, M. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Property and the governance of the family farm in rural Australia

Macquarie University, Malcolm.voyce{at}mq.edu.au

This article examines the social side of the property-holding relationship between rural families in rural Australia. I assume that property is a social relationship as well as form of technology. I argue that the technology of property is not neutral, but has social implications. My approach is to assume that settlers had various ideas of property, a core stratum of which was manipulated and governed by the state. At the same time the technical side of property, resting on the sciences of cartography, mapping and surveying, allowed the state to settle farmers on land in a controlled way to ensure productivity and social control. Thus, through stimulating ideas of freedom associated with property, the colonial state assisted the orderly development of the Australian continent.

Key Words: Australia • Foucault • governance • land • property

Journal of Sociology, Vol. 43, No. 2, 131-150 (2007)
DOI: 10.1177/1440783307076892


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?