Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Sociology
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Anleu, S. R.
Right arrow Articles by Mack, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

The professionalization of Australian magistrates

Autonomy, credentials and prestige

Sharyn Roach Anleu

Flinders University, sharyn.roachanleu{at}flinders.edu.au

Kathy Mack

Flinders University, kathy.mack{at}flinders.edu.au

Over the past 20 years or so, magistrates courts in Australia have undergone significant change, in particular, separation from the public service and credentialization, indicating greater professionalization. One important reason for separating the magistracy from the public service was to establish magistrates' independence as judicial officers, a distinctive form of professional autonomy. Drawing on a national study of magistrates and their courts, this article investigates the impact of separation from the public service and credentialization on magistrates' occupational location, and considers other dimensions of professionalization, specifically occupational status and prestige. While the professionalization of magistrates has increased, it can also be seen as incomplete. Some magistrates are dissatisfied with their autonomy, especially in relation to workload, and there is some dissatisfaction with their perceptions of the prestige and standing of their judicial office, especially in comparison with judges in the higher courts.

Key Words: Australian legal system • courts • legal profession • occupational change • professions • sociology of law

Journal of Sociology, Vol. 44, No. 2, 185-203 (2008)
DOI: 10.1177/1440783308089169
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?